- Update
Version 1.4 — title block to house standard
Title block brought to the house standard (style guide §7): the subtitle line is now the Plex Mono kicker — STRAIGHT UP NZ · report title · version · date — replacing the ad-hoc version/registration line; the displaced facts (89 pages reviewed, registration CC57436) are carried in the At a Glance summary and Introduction. Charts re-rendered in the site verdict palette. No content or tally change.
- Update
Version 1.3 — Te Whare Tapa Whā pattern note
Added a pattern note under Claim 6 drawing the structural parallel between the “four pillars” pitch and Mason Durie’s Te Whare Tapa Whā (taha tinana / hinengaro / whānau / wairua), alongside the charity’s Māori-named healing content (“Awakiri Hau Tapu,” Te Puna Aio) published without named Māori advisors or kaupapa. No new claims; the verdict tally is unchanged.
- Correction
Version 1.2 — citation audit and copy edit
Citation audit: all named-study citations re-verified against the published literature (PubMed); corrected the Jauhar et al. 2023 rebuttal’s author count (35, not 36); fixed a stale internal cross-reference (“Part 11” → Appendix A); minor typography following copywriter review.
- Correction
Version 1.1 — independent-review corrections
Corrections following independent review: added the two claim entries missing from Part 7 (Claim 10 — BetterHelp counsellor credentials; Claim 16 — Study 329/paroxetine), so all 58 claims listed in Appendix A now have a full entry, quote and verdict; re-derived the verdict tally from the catalogue itself (7 false / 9 unsupported / 13 misleading / 12 half-true / 7 pseudo-scientific marketing / 10 accurate) and updated the At a Glance summary and chart to match.
- Update
Version 1.0 — complete report published
Initial release of the complete investigative report, replacing the earlier short-form analysis: all 89 published pages catalogued; 58 claims referenced and countered across sections A–F; appendices A–F (claim-to-source map, full page catalogue, provenance checks, medication-evidence summary, glossary, methodology).
Right of reply status: pending — to be updated when the right-of-reply email is sent and any response received. The Foundation and every individual named have a standing right of reply; any response will be published verbatim in this appendix in the next version, with a change-log entry.
Corrections: none to date. Factual errors identified in future will be corrected here with the version number incremented.